April 30, 20268 min read

    CMMC L2 §3.3 AU-Family Controls, Satisfied by Construction — One Hash Chain, Three Regimes

    The Problem CMMC Actually Creates for Data Platforms

    CMMC L2 §3.3 is, at its core, an enforcement mechanism for NIST SP 800-171 / 800-53 controls — specifically the Audit & Accountability (AU) family. For any data platform that touches Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), a C3PAO assessor will eventually ask the same five questions:

    1. AU-2 — What events do you log?

    2. AU-3 — What's *in* each audit record?

    3. AU-9 — How is the audit log itself protected from modification?

    4. AU-11 — How long do you keep it, and where?

    5. AU-12 — Can the system silently stop logging?

    Most data platforms answer these with a write-mostly log table, RBAC, and a backup policy. That answer survives a tabletop exercise. It does not survive a CMMC assessment, because *the platform itself* is the entity asked to prove that the audit record cannot have been quietly rewritten.

    > Magellan AI is not itself CMMC-certified and is not a C3PAO. The product *produces the audit evidence* a CMMC assessor needs to verify the AU family.

    What "Satisfies by Construction" Means

    The Magellan Audit & Trust Ledger answers AU-9 the only way a software vendor honestly can: with a SHA-256 hash chain, not a policy. Each entry stores the hash of the previous entry. Tampering with any historical record invalidates every subsequent hash — and the verifier that detects this runs *outside* the Magellan runtime, on the exported evidence pack.

    That choice — making integrity *mathematical* rather than *procedural* — is what lets one ledger satisfy three different regulatory regimes from the same artifact:

    • HIPAA §164.312(b) — Audit controls
    • 21 CFR Part 11 §11.10(e) — Secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trail
    • CMMC L2 §3.3 AU-9 — Protection of Audit Information from modification

    We call this "one pack, three regimes."

    The AU-Family Crosswalk

    CMMC L2 §3.3 ControlWhat the assessor wants to seeHow Magellan satisfies it
    AU-2 Event LoggingA defined set of auditable events, captured every timeEvery signed mapping decision (MappingDrafted, MappingRevised, ApproverReleaseSigned, SemanticSuggestionAccepted, RoleGranted, …) writes a ledger entry — non-optional
    AU-3 Content of Audit RecordsWho, what, when, where, source, outcomeULID timestamp + actor + role-at-time-of-action + payload SHA-256 + prior-hash on every entry
    AU-3(1) Additional infoRationale + contextModel identifier, threshold profile version, confidence score on every Semantic Match suggestion
    AU-6 Review & ReportingAuditors can read; operators cannot rewriteDedicated magellan_auditor Postgres role with read-only ledger access, separate from app role
    AU-7 Reduction & ReportsDeterministic exportAttestation export bundle + standalone Python verifier script (no Magellan runtime required)
    AU-8 Time StampsSynchronized, embedded48-bit millisecond timestamp embedded in the ULID itself; chain-head signature time in WORM sink
    AU-9 Protection from ModificationTampering is detectableAppend-only enforcement (privilege revocation + trigger), SHA-256 hash chain, WORM Object Lock
    AU-9(3) Cryptographic protectionCrypto, not policySSE-KMS on the WORM head; per-entry SHA-256 chain
    AU-11 RetentionPer-program, configurableRETENTION_POLICY per tenant; WORM Object Lock enforces minimum retention
    AU-12 Audit GenerationCannot be silencedContainer fails health check if audit writes are disabled

    Retention — Policy, Not Guesswork

    CMMC L2 §3.3 AU-11 doesn't pick a single retention number. It defers to the program. That sounds flexible until you have HIPAA, Part 11, and CMMC sitting on the same dataset, each with a different floor.

    Magellan resolves this with a single rule:

    ```

    retention = max(

    regulatory_floor(regime, data_classification),

    customer_policy,

    active_legal_hold

    )

    ```

    RegimeFloor
    HIPAA §164.530(j) / §164.3166 years from creation or last effect
    21 CFR Part 11 / FDA recordsLifetime of product + 2 years
    GxP / EU Annex 11Per registration — often 10–30 years
    CMMC L2 §3.3 AU-11Per program (commonly 3 years); min. 90 days online
    FedRAMP AU-113 years minimum, 1 year online
    SOX §8027 years for audit work papers

    Customer policy and legal holds can only extend retention, never shorten it. The chosen policy itself is written to the ledger as a RetentionPolicySet entry — so when an assessor asks "what was the retention rule in force on March 14, 2024?", the answer is in the chain, not in a Confluence page.

    What This Means in a Procurement

    For a federal or DIB integrator evaluating a metadata or mapping platform under a contract that touches CUI, the CMMC AU family normally turns into a 9-to-18-month risk-acceptance conversation. With Magellan, that conversation collapses into three artifacts:

    1. The Audit & Trust Ledger (live)

    2. The exported evidence pack for the dataset in question

    3. The standalone verifier script the assessor runs themselves

    Same artifacts a Part 11 inspector asks for. Same artifacts a HIPAA OCR auditor asks for.

    That's what we mean when we say "one pack, three regimes."


    See also:

    Share:
    Back to Blog